Federal vote of 18 June 2023
On 18 June 2023 Switzerland voted on 3 proposals: Implementation of the OECD/G20 project on the taxation of large corporate groups: accepted with 78.5% yes; Federal Act on Climate Protection Targets, Innovation and Strengthening Energy Security (KIG): accepted with 59.1% yes; Amendment to the COVID-19 Act: accepted with 61.9% yes.
Implementation of the OECD/G20 project on the taxation of large corporate groups
accepted 78.5% · Turnout 42.3% · Cantons 23:0
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Vaud | 85.7% | 41.1% |
| Geneva | 85.6% | 40.1% |
| Neuchâtel | 84.7% | 36.0% |
| Zug | 82.3% | 50.7% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 81.3% | 42.7% |
| Basel-Stadt | 81.3% | 47.5% |
| Fribourg | 80.7% | 38.4% |
| Jura | 80.0% | 32.2% |
| Valais | 79.9% | 38.9% |
| Nidwalden | 79.5% | 49.5% |
| Lucerne | 78.7% | 42.0% |
| Solothurn | 78.1% | 39.5% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 77.7% | 37.2% |
| Grisons | 77.7% | 39.3% |
| Obwalden | 77.2% | 49.4% |
| Aargau | 77.0% | 40.7% |
| St. Gallen | 76.7% | 41.1% |
| Zurich | 76.6% | 44.8% |
| Thurgau | 76.3% | 41.5% |
| Schaffhausen | 75.9% | 63.2% |
| Ticino | 75.8% | 39.3% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 75.5% | 46.0% |
| Schwyz | 75.2% | 49.1% |
| Bern | 74.9% | 44.0% |
| Glarus | 73.3% | 39.9% |
| Uri | 72.8% | 41.2% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Puplinge | 91.3% | 47.0% |
| Blonay - Saint-Légier | 91.1% | 47.8% |
| Vandoeuvres | 90.9% | 57.7% |
| Saint-Sulpice (VD) | 90.6% | 53.6% |
| Pregny-Chambésy | 90.6% | 50.8% |
| Veyrier | 90.6% | 49.9% |
| Echichens | 90.4% | 45.2% |
| Assens | 90.3% | 46.3% |
| Belmont-sur-Lausanne | 90.3% | 48.3% |
| Arzier-Le Muids | 90.3% | 47.8% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Unteriberg | 56.1% | 54.1% |
| Hergiswil bei Willisau | 62.0% | 34.9% |
| Fischenthal | 62.2% | 46.5% |
| Luzein | 63.7% | 39.2% |
| Uerkheim | 64.2% | 36.6% |
| Arch | 64.3% | 40.9% |
| Rothenthurm | 64.9% | 47.0% |
| Boltigen | 65.0% | 39.7% |
| Matzendorf | 65.9% | 38.2% |
| Diemtigen | 66.1% | 41.4% |
Federal Act on Climate Protection Targets, Innovation and Strengthening Energy Security (KIG)
accepted 59.1% · Turnout 42.5%
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Geneva | 74.5% | 40.1% |
| Basel-Stadt | 73.3% | 47.5% |
| Neuchâtel | 69.9% | 36.1% |
| Vaud | 69.5% | 41.1% |
| Jura | 63.2% | 32.3% |
| Zurich | 62.5% | 45.1% |
| Fribourg | 61.9% | 38.4% |
| Lucerne | 59.0% | 42.2% |
| Bern | 58.5% | 44.0% |
| Zug | 57.6% | 50.9% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 57.2% | 43.0% |
| Grisons | 55.5% | 39.8% |
| Valais | 55.4% | 38.9% |
| Ticino | 54.8% | 39.3% |
| Solothurn | 52.9% | 39.8% |
| Aargau | 52.1% | 40.9% |
| Schaffhausen | 52.1% | 63.7% |
| St. Gallen | 52.0% | 41.3% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 50.9% | 46.5% |
| Thurgau | 49.3% | 41.7% |
| Nidwalden | 46.8% | 49.9% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 46.5% | 37.5% |
| Glarus | 46.0% | 40.0% |
| Obwalden | 43.9% | 49.7% |
| Uri | 43.1% | 41.9% |
| Schwyz | 42.5% | 49.4% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Bern | 81.8% | 52.8% |
| Lausanne | 80.8% | 38.2% |
| Troinex | 79.7% | 51.5% |
| Fribourg | 79.2% | 43.0% |
| Vevey | 78.8% | 37.6% |
| Villars-sur-Glâne | 78.4% | 41.6% |
| Zürich | 77.4% | 48.1% |
| Neuchâtel | 77.4% | 37.3% |
| Chêne-Bougeries | 77.3% | 49.8% |
| Carouge (GE) | 76.9% | 41.8% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Unteriberg | 13.0% | 54.4% |
| Boltigen | 20.2% | 39.7% |
| St. Stephan | 21.2% | 51.8% |
| Muotathal | 21.3% | 53.5% |
| Röthenbach im Emmental | 22.2% | 34.0% |
| Rothenthurm | 23.4% | 47.3% |
| Diemtigen | 26.6% | 41.4% |
| Adelboden | 26.7% | 49.0% |
| Buchholterberg | 27.6% | 40.5% |
| Uerkheim | 27.7% | 36.7% |
Amendment to the COVID-19 Act
accepted 61.9% · Turnout 42.5%
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Basel-Stadt | 72.0% | 47.5% |
| Geneva | 69.9% | 40.1% |
| Neuchâtel | 69.1% | 35.7% |
| Vaud | 68.1% | 41.1% |
| Zurich | 66.5% | 45.0% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 63.1% | 42.9% |
| Bern | 62.2% | 44.0% |
| Fribourg | 61.3% | 38.5% |
| Lucerne | 61.2% | 42.2% |
| Jura | 60.7% | 32.1% |
| Zug | 60.3% | 50.9% |
| Solothurn | 60.1% | 39.8% |
| Valais | 59.5% | 38.9% |
| Aargau | 59.1% | 40.9% |
| Grisons | 58.9% | 39.7% |
| Ticino | 57.8% | 39.3% |
| Schaffhausen | 55.5% | 63.5% |
| Nidwalden | 55.3% | 49.7% |
| St. Gallen | 54.7% | 41.2% |
| Glarus | 53.6% | 40.0% |
| Thurgau | 53.3% | 41.7% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 51.7% | 46.0% |
| Uri | 51.4% | 41.7% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 48.5% | 37.4% |
| Obwalden | 47.4% | 49.3% |
| Schwyz | 45.7% | 49.4% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Boudry | 88.6% | 26.7% |
| Ennetbaden | 80.3% | 53.8% |
| Bern | 80.0% | 52.8% |
| Bremgarten bei Bern | 79.4% | 57.5% |
| Epalinges | 76.9% | 47.0% |
| Zürich | 76.7% | 47.8% |
| Muri bei Bern | 76.5% | 55.3% |
| Lausanne | 76.3% | 38.2% |
| Veyrier | 76.0% | 49.9% |
| Pully | 75.8% | 47.6% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Unteriberg | 17.8% | 54.5% |
| Muotathal | 20.6% | 53.5% |
| Boltigen | 26.3% | 39.7% |
| Rothenthurm | 28.9% | 47.3% |
| St. Stephan | 29.9% | 51.8% |
| Adelboden | 30.9% | 49.0% |
| Diemtigen | 31.1% | 41.4% |
| Röthenbach im Emmental | 31.3% | 34.0% |
| Linden | 31.6% | 39.9% |
| Buchholterberg | 32.1% | 40.4% |
← Earlier vote: 25 September 2022All votesLater vote: 3 March 2024 →
Source: Federal Statistical Office (FSO), results of federal votes (open data). Communes within today’s boundaries. Official titles of the proposals. dam-api.bfs.admin.ch