Compare 2027 premiums → · · Switching insurer: your cancellation must reach the insurer by 30 November

Federal vote of 16 May 2004

On 16 May 2004 Switzerland voted on 3 proposals: Amendment to the federal law on old age-, widows- and orphans insurance (11th revision): rejected with 32.1% yes; Federal decree on financing old age-, widows-, orphans- and disability insurance by raising level of VAT: rejected with 31.4% yes; Federal law on amendment to regulations affecting taxation for married couples and families on private housing and on stamp duty: rejected with 34.1% yes.

Amendment to the federal law on old age-, widows- and orphans insurance (11th revision)

rejected 32.1% · Turnout 50.8%

Zurich: 38.9%Bern: 30.7%Lucerne: 37.0%Uri: 27.6%Schwyz: 37.7%Obwalden: 36.1%Nidwalden: 40.1%Glarus: 35.4%Zug: 39.6%Fribourg: 22.8%Solothurn: 29.4%Basel-Stadt: 26.1%Basel-Landschaft: 28.6%Schaffhausen: 34.0%Appenzell Outer Rhodes: 41.1%Appenzell Inner Rhodes: 45.9%St. Gallen: 40.2%Grisons: 32.1%Aargau: 35.1%Thurgau: 39.0%Ticino: 24.9%Vaud: 29.4%Valais: 17.6%Neuchâtel: 21.0%Geneva: 26.2%Jura: 13.6%ZHBELUURSZOWGLFRSOBLSGGRAGTGTIVDVSNEJU
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Yes share by canton
Result by canton
CantonYesTurnout
Appenzell Inner Rhodes45.9%42.1%
Appenzell Outer Rhodes41.1%56.1%
St. Gallen40.2%46.8%
Nidwalden40.1%52.8%
Zug39.6%55.6%
Thurgau39.0%45.6%
Zurich38.9%52.0%
Schwyz37.7%53.4%
Lucerne37.0%54.0%
Obwalden36.1%51.4%
Glarus35.4%42.4%
Aargau35.1%46.9%
Schaffhausen34.0%66.4%
Grisons32.1%44.1%
Bern30.7%49.4%
Solothurn29.4%51.4%
Vaud29.4%53.0%
Basel-Landschaft28.6%52.2%
Uri27.6%49.3%
Geneva26.2%56.8%
Basel-Stadt26.1%56.3%
Ticino24.9%48.0%
Fribourg22.8%51.2%
Neuchâtel21.0%57.5%
Valais17.6%44.1%
Jura13.6%55.4%
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share

Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.

Highest yes share

CommuneYesTurnout
Zumikon58.6%61.7%
Herrliberg58.3%60.3%
Uitikon58.1%63.3%
Vandoeuvres56.8%65.1%
Cologny56.1%62.3%
Küsnacht (ZH)55.6%60.1%
Erlenbach (ZH)54.0%58.5%
Zollikon53.8%60.5%
Stammheim53.2%54.2%
Mörschwil52.6%56.7%

Lowest yes share

CommuneYesTurnout
Tavannes9.7%47.7%
Ayent10.2%49.2%
Val-d'Illiez10.3%47.1%
Fontenais10.7%60.1%
Haute-Sorne11.1%56.5%
Anniviers11.1%59.1%
Collombey-Muraz11.1%39.5%
Chalais11.4%44.5%
Saignelégier11.5%53.9%
Courrendlin11.5%54.9%

Federal decree on financing old age-, widows-, orphans- and disability insurance by raising level of VAT

rejected 31.4% · Turnout 50.8% · Cantons 0:23

Zurich: 36.6%Bern: 34.1%Lucerne: 29.7%Uri: 24.3%Schwyz: 24.4%Obwalden: 22.7%Nidwalden: 21.7%Glarus: 28.8%Zug: 28.9%Fribourg: 23.9%Solothurn: 26.3%Basel-Stadt: 39.3%Basel-Landschaft: 33.1%Schaffhausen: 29.7%Appenzell Outer Rhodes: 30.1%Appenzell Inner Rhodes: 24.3%St. Gallen: 31.6%Grisons: 27.8%Aargau: 28.1%Thurgau: 28.1%Ticino: 27.0%Vaud: 37.1%Valais: 20.0%Neuchâtel: 29.7%Geneva: 32.0%Jura: 18.9%ZHBELUURSZOWGLFRSOBLSGGRAGTGTIVDVSNEJU
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Yes share by canton
Result by canton
CantonYesTurnout
Basel-Stadt39.3%56.3%
Vaud37.1%53.0%
Zurich36.6%52.0%
Bern34.1%49.4%
Basel-Landschaft33.1%52.2%
Geneva32.0%56.8%
St. Gallen31.6%46.9%
Appenzell Outer Rhodes30.1%56.3%
Lucerne29.7%54.0%
Neuchâtel29.7%57.5%
Schaffhausen29.7%66.4%
Zug28.9%55.6%
Glarus28.8%42.5%
Aargau28.1%47.0%
Thurgau28.1%45.6%
Grisons27.8%44.2%
Ticino27.0%48.0%
Solothurn26.3%51.4%
Schwyz24.4%53.4%
Appenzell Inner Rhodes24.3%42.2%
Uri24.3%49.4%
Fribourg23.9%51.2%
Obwalden22.7%51.4%
Nidwalden21.7%52.8%
Valais20.0%44.2%
Jura18.9%55.4%
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share

Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.

Highest yes share

CommuneYesTurnout
Oberhofen am Thunersee63.3%62.7%
Bern45.6%52.8%
Zürich44.8%49.7%
Bolligen44.0%62.7%
Kirchlindach43.2%61.1%
Lausanne42.6%50.2%
Wohlen bei Bern42.4%58.1%
Bremgarten bei Bern42.1%64.2%
Chardonne42.1%56.9%
Köniz41.6%57.7%

Lowest yes share

CommuneYesTurnout
Broc3.9%51.4%
St. Niklaus8.4%37.0%
Unteriberg10.0%51.4%
Grächen11.3%33.5%
Gampel-Bratsch12.4%51.9%
Val-d'Illiez13.0%47.1%
Rothenthurm13.0%58.0%
Steg-Hohtenn13.1%53.8%
Goms13.3%46.1%
Sattel13.4%63.0%

Federal law on amendment to regulations affecting taxation for married couples and families on private housing and on stamp duty

rejected 34.1% · Turnout 50.8%

Zurich: 38.9%Bern: 27.3%Lucerne: 38.8%Uri: 25.5%Schwyz: 42.2%Obwalden: 33.8%Nidwalden: 43.1%Glarus: 33.5%Zug: 43.0%Fribourg: 24.5%Solothurn: 31.8%Basel-Stadt: 24.4%Basel-Landschaft: 29.9%Schaffhausen: 38.3%Appenzell Outer Rhodes: 45.4%Appenzell Inner Rhodes: 48.2%St. Gallen: 44.8%Grisons: 28.4%Aargau: 39.7%Thurgau: 45.9%Ticino: 33.8%Vaud: 34.8%Valais: 18.3%Neuchâtel: 28.5%Geneva: 31.8%Jura: 18.2%ZHBELUURSZOWGLFRSOBLSGGRAGTGTIVDVSNEJU
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Yes share by canton
Result by canton
CantonYesTurnout
Appenzell Inner Rhodes48.2%42.1%
Thurgau45.9%45.6%
Appenzell Outer Rhodes45.4%56.3%
St. Gallen44.8%47.0%
Nidwalden43.1%52.9%
Zug43.0%55.6%
Schwyz42.2%53.4%
Aargau39.7%47.0%
Zurich38.9%52.0%
Lucerne38.8%54.1%
Schaffhausen38.3%66.4%
Vaud34.8%52.9%
Obwalden33.8%51.5%
Ticino33.8%48.0%
Glarus33.5%42.5%
Geneva31.8%56.8%
Solothurn31.8%51.4%
Basel-Landschaft29.9%52.3%
Neuchâtel28.5%57.4%
Grisons28.4%44.2%
Bern27.3%49.4%
Uri25.5%49.5%
Fribourg24.5%51.0%
Basel-Stadt24.4%56.2%
Valais18.3%44.1%
Jura18.2%55.4%
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share

Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.

Highest yes share

CommuneYesTurnout
Cologny65.8%62.3%
Vandoeuvres65.6%65.1%
Crans (VD)63.6%58.7%
Uitikon62.7%63.5%
Zumikon61.5%62.2%
Commugny61.4%58.2%
Founex61.2%56.1%
Diepoldsau60.8%42.4%
Bergdietikon60.6%52.8%
Herrliberg60.3%60.4%

Lowest yes share

CommuneYesTurnout
Ayent10.4%49.2%
Goms10.5%46.1%
Anniviers10.7%59.1%
Hérémence10.8%52.4%
Grächen11.0%33.5%
Val-d'Illiez11.5%47.1%
Tramelan12.4%54.6%
Troistorrents12.6%41.8%
Tavannes12.6%47.7%
Visperterminen12.7%47.6%

← Earlier vote: 8 February 2004All votesLater vote: 26 September 2004 →

Source: Federal Statistical Office (FSO), results of federal votes (open data). Communes within today’s boundaries. Official titles of the proposals. dam-api.bfs.admin.ch