Compare 2027 premiums → · · Switching insurer: your cancellation must reach the insurer by 30 November

Federal vote of 8 February 2004

On 8 February 2004 Switzerland voted on 3 proposals: Counter-proposal of Federal Assembly of 3rd October 2003 to the Popular Initiative 'Avanti-for safe, efficient motorways': rejected with 37.2% yes; Amendment to the law on obligations (rents): rejected with 35.9% yes; Popular initiative 'Lifelong detention for perpetrators of sexual or violent crimes who are judged to be highly dangerous and untreatable': accepted with 56.2% yes.

Counter-proposal of Federal Assembly of 3rd October 2003 to the Popular Initiative 'Avanti-for safe, efficient motorways'

rejected 37.2% · Turnout 45.6% · Cantons 0:23

Zurich: 37.6%Bern: 35.7%Lucerne: 37.6%Uri: 26.4%Schwyz: 41.7%Obwalden: 37.2%Nidwalden: 35.7%Glarus: 30.3%Zug: 41.7%Fribourg: 36.2%Solothurn: 37.7%Basel-Stadt: 34.6%Basel-Landschaft: 37.4%Schaffhausen: 33.3%Appenzell Outer Rhodes: 34.9%Appenzell Inner Rhodes: 31.7%St. Gallen: 34.8%Grisons: 25.3%Aargau: 41.9%Thurgau: 34.2%Ticino: 44.3%Vaud: 39.4%Valais: 28.2%Neuchâtel: 37.8%Geneva: 40.9%Jura: 30.5%ZHBELUURSZOWGLFRSOBLSGGRAGTGTIVDVSNEJU
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Yes share by canton
Result by canton
CantonYesTurnout
Ticino44.3%44.3%
Aargau41.9%40.0%
Schwyz41.7%47.1%
Zug41.7%52.1%
Geneva40.9%56.1%
Vaud39.4%49.9%
Neuchâtel37.8%56.3%
Solothurn37.7%47.3%
Lucerne37.6%49.0%
Zurich37.6%47.5%
Basel-Landschaft37.4%48.9%
Obwalden37.2%46.7%
Fribourg36.2%40.4%
Bern35.7%43.0%
Nidwalden35.7%50.9%
Appenzell Outer Rhodes34.9%55.6%
St. Gallen34.8%42.5%
Basel-Stadt34.6%52.8%
Thurgau34.2%38.2%
Schaffhausen33.3%63.7%
Appenzell Inner Rhodes31.7%37.5%
Jura30.5%36.0%
Glarus30.3%45.1%
Valais28.2%31.3%
Uri26.4%55.8%
Grisons25.3%36.6%
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share

Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.

Highest yes share

CommuneYesTurnout
Cologny65.7%64.7%
Vandoeuvres63.4%68.0%
Anières61.7%65.4%
Collonge-Bellerive59.9%66.6%
Founex58.7%48.3%
Airolo58.3%63.6%
Commugny58.1%51.3%
Hochdorf56.5%55.2%
Blenio55.7%71.9%
Crans (VD)55.6%48.2%

Lowest yes share

CommuneYesTurnout
Ried-Brig10.9%33.7%
Raron13.9%30.7%
Trun14.5%28.0%
Steg-Hohtenn16.1%41.7%
St. Niklaus16.2%21.1%
Gampel-Bratsch16.3%37.0%
Brig-Glis16.7%29.7%
Grächen16.9%16.9%
Naters17.3%31.8%
Tujetsch17.3%30.7%

Amendment to the law on obligations (rents)

rejected 35.9% · Turnout 45.4%

Zurich: 38.7%Bern: 36.6%Lucerne: 41.4%Uri: 40.4%Schwyz: 48.7%Obwalden: 43.3%Nidwalden: 43.9%Glarus: 43.7%Zug: 43.2%Fribourg: 28.6%Solothurn: 41.4%Basel-Stadt: 26.1%Basel-Landschaft: 37.6%Schaffhausen: 39.3%Appenzell Outer Rhodes: 47.4%Appenzell Inner Rhodes: 46.5%St. Gallen: 41.8%Grisons: 47.8%Aargau: 44.4%Thurgau: 45.0%Ticino: 43.8%Vaud: 16.9%Valais: 30.2%Neuchâtel: 21.0%Geneva: 24.4%Jura: 21.5%ZHBELUURSZOWGLFRSOBLSGGRAGTGTIVDVSNEJU
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Yes share by canton
Result by canton
CantonYesTurnout
Schwyz48.7%46.8%
Grisons47.8%35.9%
Appenzell Outer Rhodes47.4%54.5%
Appenzell Inner Rhodes46.5%37.4%
Thurgau45.0%38.0%
Aargau44.4%39.7%
Nidwalden43.9%50.6%
Ticino43.8%44.3%
Glarus43.7%45.0%
Obwalden43.3%46.5%
Zug43.2%52.0%
St. Gallen41.8%42.1%
Lucerne41.4%48.7%
Solothurn41.4%47.2%
Uri40.4%53.6%
Schaffhausen39.3%64.0%
Zurich38.7%47.2%
Basel-Landschaft37.6%48.9%
Bern36.6%43.0%
Valais30.2%31.2%
Fribourg28.6%40.3%
Basel-Stadt26.1%53.1%
Geneva24.4%56.1%
Jura21.5%35.9%
Neuchâtel21.0%56.4%
Vaud16.9%49.9%
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share

Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.

Highest yes share

CommuneYesTurnout
Uitikon62.7%54.1%
Oberwil-Lieli60.5%42.5%
Ilanz/Glion59.2%32.7%
Bergdietikon59.2%43.9%
Oberhofen am Thunersee58.8%56.2%
Val Müstair57.5%31.2%
Wollerau57.4%46.9%
Quinto56.9%59.2%
Pontresina56.7%34.2%
Zumikon56.2%55.6%

Lowest yes share

CommuneYesTurnout
Chavannes-près-Renens6.8%49.1%
Lausanne7.4%50.4%
Prilly8.0%50.9%
Renens (VD)8.5%49.7%
Vevey9.0%47.6%
Penthalaz9.8%51.8%
Romanel-sur-Lausanne10.0%54.7%
Ecublens (VD)11.1%49.1%
Yverdon-les-Bains11.3%50.3%
Bussigny11.3%50.3%

Popular initiative 'Lifelong detention for perpetrators of sexual or violent crimes who are judged to be highly dangerous and untreatable'

accepted 56.2% · Turnout 45.5% · Cantons 21.5:1.5

Zurich: 53.1%Bern: 53.0%Lucerne: 55.8%Uri: 61.6%Schwyz: 63.3%Obwalden: 55.9%Nidwalden: 57.1%Glarus: 60.8%Zug: 53.0%Fribourg: 56.9%Solothurn: 62.8%Basel-Stadt: 48.1%Basel-Landschaft: 53.8%Schaffhausen: 63.4%Appenzell Outer Rhodes: 59.4%Appenzell Inner Rhodes: 57.1%St. Gallen: 61.6%Grisons: 58.9%Aargau: 57.3%Thurgau: 59.2%Ticino: 74.6%Vaud: 49.6%Valais: 63.3%Neuchâtel: 60.4%Geneva: 52.9%Jura: 52.8%ZHBELUURSZOWGLFRSOBLSGGRAGTGTIVDVSNEJU
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Yes share by canton
Result by canton
CantonYesTurnout
Ticino74.6%44.3%
Schaffhausen63.4%63.8%
Schwyz63.3%46.3%
Valais63.3%31.3%
Solothurn62.8%47.3%
St. Gallen61.6%42.5%
Uri61.6%54.9%
Glarus60.8%45.2%
Neuchâtel60.4%56.3%
Appenzell Outer Rhodes59.4%55.3%
Thurgau59.2%38.1%
Grisons58.9%36.3%
Aargau57.3%39.9%
Appenzell Inner Rhodes57.1%37.4%
Nidwalden57.1%50.7%
Fribourg56.9%40.4%
Obwalden55.9%46.7%
Lucerne55.8%48.9%
Basel-Landschaft53.8%49.1%
Zurich53.1%47.4%
Bern53.0%43.0%
Zug53.0%52.1%
Geneva52.9%56.1%
Jura52.8%36.0%
Vaud49.6%49.9%
Basel-Stadt48.1%52.7%
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share

Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.

Highest yes share

CommuneYesTurnout
Blenio88.9%71.9%
Airolo86.4%63.6%
Biasca84.5%38.5%
Serravalle83.6%45.6%
Riviera83.3%41.8%
Acquarossa82.1%37.4%
Quinto81.8%59.2%
Sant'Antonino81.2%40.4%
Monteceneri81.2%45.4%
Hägendorf80.6%53.6%

Lowest yes share

CommuneYesTurnout
Ennetbaden37.1%51.2%
Saignelégier41.9%35.8%
Lausanne42.5%50.3%
Bern42.7%48.3%
Founex43.4%48.4%
Arlesheim43.7%55.6%
Lutry44.9%54.3%
Kirchlindach44.9%58.1%
Prangins45.0%52.1%
Belmont-sur-Lausanne45.0%54.7%

← Earlier vote: 18 May 2003All votesLater vote: 16 May 2004 →

Source: Federal Statistical Office (FSO), results of federal votes (open data). Communes within today’s boundaries. Official titles of the proposals. dam-api.bfs.admin.ch