Federal vote of 28 November 1982
On 28 November 1982 Switzerland voted on 2 proposals: Popular Initiative 'Prevention of false pricing': accepted with 57.9% yes; Popular initiative 'Prevention of false pricing' (Counter-proposal): rejected with 24.8% yes.
Popular Initiative 'Prevention of false pricing'
accepted 57.9% · Turnout 32.9% · Cantons 18:5
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Jura | 78.5% | 21.6% |
| Ticino | 75.2% | 29.8% |
| Basel-Stadt | 69.7% | 29.3% |
| Solothurn | 64.1% | 37.2% |
| Geneva | 63.4% | 21.3% |
| Neuchâtel | 62.2% | 30.9% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 61.1% | 30.7% |
| Zurich | 59.9% | 38.2% |
| Glarus | 57.9% | 31.9% |
| Vaud | 57.9% | 40.3% |
| Uri | 57.3% | 39.7% |
| Fribourg | 57.1% | 24.2% |
| Bern | 56.6% | 31.2% |
| Schaffhausen | 55.7% | 68.5% |
| Zug | 55.6% | 39.6% |
| Aargau | 55.1% | 29.7% |
| Lucerne | 54.0% | 32.5% |
| Grisons | 53.5% | 32.4% |
| St. Gallen | 53.2% | 30.7% |
| Thurgau | 48.0% | 41.9% |
| Schwyz | 47.6% | 31.7% |
| Nidwalden | 45.4% | 31.4% |
| Obwalden | 44.9% | 24.7% |
| Valais | 44.0% | 20.3% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 41.3% | 37.1% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 35.2% | 29.3% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Haute-Sorne | 87.8% | 21.5% |
| Arbedo-Castione | 86.6% | 26.8% |
| Val Terbi | 86.1% | 23.8% |
| Stabio | 85.9% | 24.8% |
| Biasca | 84.9% | 26.7% |
| Bellinzona | 82.7% | 27.4% |
| Courtételle | 82.6% | 20.5% |
| Balerna | 82.1% | 36.2% |
| Riviera | 81.7% | 27.8% |
| Vacallo | 81.5% | 48.4% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Orsières | 13.7% | 28.6% |
| Leytron | 23.1% | 9.8% |
| Lens | 23.6% | 12.4% |
| Ardon | 24.5% | 20.4% |
| Waldkirch | 27.0% | 30.5% |
| Val de Bagnes | 27.3% | 26.2% |
| Chamoson | 27.4% | 21.8% |
| Buttisholz | 27.7% | 25.0% |
| Eggiwil | 28.1% | 14.4% |
| Hohenrain | 28.7% | 29.1% |
Popular initiative 'Prevention of false pricing' (Counter-proposal)
rejected 24.8% · Turnout 32.9% · Cantons 0:23
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Thurgau | 33.9% | 41.9% |
| Grisons | 33.4% | 32.4% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 31.8% | 30.7% |
| St. Gallen | 30.1% | 30.7% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 29.9% | 29.3% |
| Nidwalden | 29.9% | 31.4% |
| Bern | 28.3% | 31.2% |
| Basel-Stadt | 28.1% | 29.3% |
| Aargau | 27.0% | 29.7% |
| Lucerne | 26.5% | 32.5% |
| Solothurn | 25.7% | 37.2% |
| Fribourg | 24.9% | 24.2% |
| Glarus | 24.8% | 31.9% |
| Zug | 24.8% | 39.6% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 24.2% | 37.1% |
| Obwalden | 24.2% | 24.7% |
| Zurich | 24.0% | 38.2% |
| Schwyz | 23.1% | 31.7% |
| Vaud | 22.4% | 40.3% |
| Uri | 22.3% | 39.7% |
| Schaffhausen | 17.8% | 68.5% |
| Neuchâtel | 15.7% | 30.9% |
| Valais | 15.3% | 20.3% |
| Geneva | 13.8% | 21.3% |
| Ticino | 13.8% | 29.8% |
| Jura | 12.1% | 21.6% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Aadorf | 70.6% | 40.0% |
| Eggiwil | 50.0% | 14.4% |
| Seedorf (BE) | 46.9% | 60.4% |
| Erlen | 46.3% | 35.5% |
| Bregaglia | 45.3% | 26.6% |
| Cazis | 44.1% | 24.5% |
| Meikirch | 44.0% | 39.5% |
| Heimiswil | 43.2% | 18.5% |
| Hergiswil bei Willisau | 42.8% | 19.2% |
| Hofstetten-Flüh | 42.0% | 31.1% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Riddes | 5.6% | 34.8% |
| Haute-Sorne | 5.7% | 21.5% |
| Arbedo-Castione | 6.0% | 26.8% |
| Riviera | 7.5% | 27.8% |
| Chamoson | 7.9% | 21.8% |
| Val Terbi | 8.3% | 23.8% |
| Courrendlin | 8.4% | 19.6% |
| Vétroz | 8.4% | 17.6% |
| Savièse | 8.8% | 12.2% |
| Fully | 9.2% | 21.9% |
← Earlier vote: 6 June 1982All votesLater vote: 27 February 1983 →
Source: Federal Statistical Office (FSO), results of federal votes (open data). Communes within today’s boundaries. Official titles of the proposals. dam-api.bfs.admin.ch