Federal vote of 3 March 2013
On 3 March 2013 Switzerland voted on 3 proposals: Federal resolution on family policy: rejected with 54.3% yes; Popular initiative 'against fat-cat bonuses: accepted with 68.0% yes; Amendment to the federal law on spatial planning: accepted with 62.9% yes.
Federal resolution on family policy
rejected 54.3% · Turnout 46.6% · Cantons 10:13
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Geneva | 79.1% | 46.5% |
| Vaud | 70.8% | 46.4% |
| Jura | 70.3% | 40.3% |
| Neuchâtel | 69.8% | 42.2% |
| Ticino | 66.7% | 41.5% |
| Basel-Stadt | 65.0% | 49.4% |
| Fribourg | 62.7% | 44.4% |
| Valais | 57.6% | 67.6% |
| Zurich | 53.6% | 46.2% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 52.8% | 45.3% |
| Solothurn | 50.4% | 48.6% |
| Bern | 49.4% | 43.4% |
| Grisons | 48.8% | 56.1% |
| Lucerne | 48.8% | 46.3% |
| Zug | 47.5% | 51.7% |
| Aargau | 47.2% | 44.2% |
| Schaffhausen | 44.3% | 64.9% |
| St. Gallen | 42.8% | 43.9% |
| Glarus | 42.6% | 36.1% |
| Thurgau | 41.7% | 43.1% |
| Nidwalden | 41.0% | 49.2% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 40.6% | 51.6% |
| Obwalden | 38.0% | 51.6% |
| Schwyz | 36.9% | 49.1% |
| Uri | 31.8% | 41.4% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 27.1% | 41.9% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Troinex | 83.1% | 57.6% |
| Chêne-Bourg | 81.4% | 46.1% |
| Carouge (GE) | 80.3% | 47.1% |
| Genève | 80.1% | 45.9% |
| Lausanne | 79.7% | 42.7% |
| Confignon | 79.3% | 55.5% |
| Le Grand-Saconnex | 79.3% | 44.1% |
| Lancy | 79.1% | 45.7% |
| Bernex | 78.9% | 51.2% |
| Corsier (GE) | 78.9% | 51.9% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| St. Stephan | 15.8% | 50.4% |
| Unteriberg | 17.5% | 46.4% |
| Adelboden | 19.2% | 47.7% |
| Silenen | 19.3% | 33.1% |
| Muotathal | 20.5% | 52.5% |
| Gonten | 20.6% | 43.7% |
| Röthenbach im Emmental | 21.4% | 29.6% |
| Rothenthurm | 22.1% | 51.3% |
| Attinghausen | 22.5% | 38.0% |
| Diemtigen | 24.2% | 34.4% |
Popular initiative 'against fat-cat bonuses
accepted 68.0% · Turnout 46.7% · Cantons 23:0
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Jura | 77.1% | 40.4% |
| Schaffhausen | 75.9% | 65.2% |
| Neuchâtel | 71.9% | 42.4% |
| Ticino | 70.7% | 41.5% |
| Thurgau | 70.5% | 43.2% |
| Bern | 70.4% | 43.4% |
| Fribourg | 70.3% | 44.5% |
| Zurich | 70.2% | 46.5% |
| Glarus | 69.6% | 36.2% |
| Solothurn | 67.9% | 48.7% |
| Geneva | 67.7% | 46.5% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 67.5% | 45.4% |
| Basel-Stadt | 67.3% | 49.7% |
| Aargau | 66.8% | 44.4% |
| Vaud | 66.5% | 46.4% |
| St. Gallen | 66.4% | 44.0% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 66.3% | 51.8% |
| Lucerne | 66.3% | 46.4% |
| Grisons | 65.6% | 56.7% |
| Uri | 64.3% | 41.4% |
| Valais | 63.7% | 67.6% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 61.0% | 41.9% |
| Schwyz | 60.8% | 49.3% |
| Zug | 58.2% | 51.9% |
| Nidwalden | 57.7% | 49.3% |
| Obwalden | 56.1% | 51.5% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Tramelan | 84.8% | 41.8% |
| Wagenhausen | 84.4% | 44.8% |
| Plateau de Diesse | 83.7% | 42.8% |
| Moutier | 83.6% | 39.4% |
| Tavannes | 82.8% | 36.5% |
| Reconvilier | 82.5% | 43.0% |
| Haute-Sorne | 82.2% | 40.1% |
| Fontenais | 80.8% | 45.2% |
| Trub | 80.7% | 27.6% |
| Le Noirmont | 80.2% | 38.8% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Vandoeuvres | 41.0% | 57.1% |
| St. Niklaus | 43.6% | 66.6% |
| Cologny | 46.4% | 54.0% |
| Corsier (GE) | 46.7% | 51.9% |
| Anières | 47.1% | 55.7% |
| Collonge-Bellerive | 47.8% | 56.1% |
| Founex | 48.0% | 50.5% |
| Muotathal | 49.5% | 52.8% |
| Zumikon | 51.2% | 59.4% |
| Wollerau | 51.7% | 56.9% |
Amendment to the federal law on spatial planning
accepted 62.9% · Turnout 46.5%
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Basel-Stadt | 78.1% | 49.2% |
| Zug | 71.4% | 51.7% |
| Zurich | 71.3% | 46.1% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 70.3% | 44.6% |
| Solothurn | 69.5% | 48.5% |
| Thurgau | 68.6% | 43.1% |
| Lucerne | 68.1% | 46.2% |
| Neuchâtel | 67.7% | 41.9% |
| Aargau | 66.9% | 44.0% |
| Bern | 66.8% | 43.4% |
| Glarus | 66.6% | 36.1% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 66.0% | 51.4% |
| St. Gallen | 64.3% | 43.8% |
| Schaffhausen | 63.2% | 64.9% |
| Fribourg | 62.9% | 44.4% |
| Jura | 62.8% | 40.1% |
| Grisons | 61.5% | 55.8% |
| Nidwalden | 59.1% | 49.1% |
| Geneva | 57.7% | 46.5% |
| Schwyz | 56.6% | 49.0% |
| Vaud | 56.4% | 46.4% |
| Obwalden | 56.3% | 51.6% |
| Uri | 55.9% | 41.1% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 55.4% | 41.8% |
| Ticino | 55.3% | 41.5% |
| Valais | 19.6% | 67.5% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Bern | 81.0% | 46.8% |
| Solothurn | 80.3% | 48.7% |
| Zürich | 80.1% | 44.2% |
| Ennetbaden | 79.3% | 57.7% |
| Birsfelden | 79.2% | 38.0% |
| Winterthur | 78.4% | 46.6% |
| Olten | 78.4% | 49.9% |
| Basel | 78.4% | 49.2% |
| Luzern | 77.5% | 45.0% |
| Langendorf | 77.3% | 50.6% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Evolène | 6.0% | 88.1% |
| Hérémence | 9.3% | 81.1% |
| Nendaz | 10.0% | 73.9% |
| St. Niklaus | 11.1% | 66.4% |
| Val de Bagnes | 11.2% | 69.4% |
| Ardon | 11.8% | 72.9% |
| Grächen | 12.1% | 62.2% |
| Orsières | 12.6% | 84.4% |
| Grône | 12.9% | 73.9% |
| Anniviers | 13.3% | 77.2% |
← Earlier vote: 25 November 2012All votesLater vote: 9 June 2013 →
Source: Federal Statistical Office (FSO), results of federal votes (open data). Communes within today’s boundaries. Official titles of the proposals. dam-api.bfs.admin.ch