Federal vote of 24 September 2017
On 24 September 2017 Switzerland voted on 3 proposals: Federal Decree on Food Security: accepted with 78.7% yes; Federal Decree on Additional Funding for OASI Pensions: rejected with 50.0% yes; Federal Act on the 2020 Pension Reforms: rejected with 47.3% yes.
Federal Decree on Food Security
accepted 78.7% · Turnout 47.1% · Cantons 23:0
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Vaud | 92.0% | 45.8% |
| Jura | 89.8% | 43.1% |
| Geneva | 88.3% | 45.9% |
| Neuchâtel | 88.1% | 45.9% |
| Ticino | 87.7% | 45.0% |
| Fribourg | 85.2% | 45.2% |
| Valais | 84.3% | 47.3% |
| Basel-Stadt | 77.4% | 50.3% |
| Zurich | 77.3% | 47.9% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 77.2% | 47.8% |
| Bern | 76.0% | 45.4% |
| Lucerne | 75.9% | 50.8% |
| Nidwalden | 75.6% | 50.3% |
| Uri | 74.9% | 42.6% |
| Obwalden | 74.6% | 51.1% |
| Aargau | 74.5% | 48.1% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 74.5% | 42.6% |
| Grisons | 74.5% | 43.5% |
| Zug | 73.8% | 52.7% |
| Solothurn | 73.5% | 46.2% |
| Schaffhausen | 72.4% | 66.5% |
| St. Gallen | 72.1% | 46.7% |
| Thurgau | 71.4% | 45.6% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 70.4% | 49.7% |
| Glarus | 69.3% | 41.2% |
| Schwyz | 69.1% | 49.8% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Gimel | 96.6% | 45.4% |
| Echichens | 96.1% | 49.5% |
| Coppet | 95.6% | 54.1% |
| Assens | 95.3% | 56.6% |
| Mont-sur-Rolle | 95.3% | 49.5% |
| Forel (Lavaux) | 95.1% | 50.2% |
| Crans (VD) | 94.7% | 52.5% |
| Commugny | 94.6% | 54.5% |
| Chexbres | 94.5% | 50.7% |
| Prangins | 94.4% | 54.1% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Schwarzenberg | 55.6% | 53.2% |
| Bergdietikon | 56.2% | 52.1% |
| Hasle (LU) | 58.3% | 47.2% |
| Urtenen-Schönbühl | 58.4% | 42.1% |
| Unteriberg | 60.2% | 45.5% |
| Kaltbrunn | 61.1% | 39.3% |
| Benken (SG) | 61.3% | 44.6% |
| St. Stephan | 62.4% | 45.9% |
| Schänis | 62.9% | 41.9% |
| Tobel-Tägerschen | 63.2% | 43.1% |
Federal Decree on Additional Funding for OASI Pensions
rejected 50.0% · Turnout 47.4% · Cantons 9.5:13.5
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Jura | 57.8% | 43.1% |
| Basel-Stadt | 56.6% | 50.3% |
| Fribourg | 56.1% | 45.2% |
| Neuchâtel | 55.7% | 46.1% |
| Ticino | 55.2% | 45.0% |
| Zurich | 54.4% | 48.5% |
| Bern | 53.0% | 45.4% |
| Vaud | 52.1% | 45.8% |
| Valais | 52.0% | 47.4% |
| Lucerne | 50.5% | 51.2% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 48.5% | 48.3% |
| Grisons | 47.3% | 44.1% |
| Schaffhausen | 46.7% | 66.8% |
| Uri | 46.2% | 43.1% |
| Aargau | 45.8% | 48.6% |
| Zug | 45.0% | 53.1% |
| Solothurn | 44.5% | 46.9% |
| St. Gallen | 43.5% | 47.1% |
| Thurgau | 42.8% | 45.9% |
| Geneva | 42.6% | 45.9% |
| Obwalden | 42.6% | 51.3% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 42.2% | 50.2% |
| Nidwalden | 40.2% | 50.8% |
| Glarus | 38.7% | 41.5% |
| Schwyz | 37.8% | 50.1% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 37.3% | 42.7% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Bern | 70.1% | 49.3% |
| Fribourg | 65.4% | 46.8% |
| Zürich | 64.6% | 47.8% |
| Visperterminen | 64.6% | 46.8% |
| Ennetbaden | 64.5% | 59.8% |
| Neyruz (FR) | 64.3% | 48.2% |
| Matran | 64.0% | 48.9% |
| Delémont | 63.9% | 41.9% |
| Porrentruy | 63.3% | 41.3% |
| Marly | 63.2% | 50.5% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Unteriberg | 13.0% | 46.2% |
| Rothenthurm | 24.7% | 46.2% |
| Muotathal | 27.5% | 46.3% |
| Arch | 28.1% | 41.6% |
| Gonten | 28.9% | 43.2% |
| Urnäsch | 29.0% | 45.2% |
| Tuggen | 30.0% | 44.7% |
| Buchholterberg | 30.3% | 40.3% |
| Rüthi (SG) | 30.4% | 46.3% |
| Röthenbach im Emmental | 30.4% | 31.1% |
Federal Act on the 2020 Pension Reforms
rejected 47.3% · Turnout 47.4%
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Jura | 56.8% | 43.1% |
| Basel-Stadt | 55.0% | 50.3% |
| Fribourg | 54.1% | 45.2% |
| Ticino | 53.9% | 45.0% |
| Neuchâtel | 51.8% | 46.0% |
| Zurich | 50.9% | 48.5% |
| Valais | 50.4% | 47.4% |
| Bern | 50.0% | 45.4% |
| Vaud | 49.1% | 45.8% |
| Lucerne | 47.9% | 51.2% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 45.9% | 48.3% |
| Grisons | 45.8% | 44.2% |
| Uri | 45.2% | 43.1% |
| Schaffhausen | 44.0% | 66.7% |
| Aargau | 43.0% | 48.6% |
| Solothurn | 42.5% | 46.8% |
| Zug | 42.3% | 53.3% |
| Obwalden | 41.7% | 51.3% |
| St. Gallen | 40.8% | 47.1% |
| Thurgau | 40.1% | 45.9% |
| Geneva | 39.7% | 45.9% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 39.5% | 50.2% |
| Nidwalden | 39.0% | 50.8% |
| Glarus | 37.0% | 41.5% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 36.7% | 42.8% |
| Schwyz | 35.7% | 50.1% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Sumvitg | 75.7% | 37.5% |
| Bern | 68.2% | 49.3% |
| Matran | 63.8% | 48.8% |
| Fribourg | 63.7% | 46.8% |
| Visperterminen | 63.7% | 46.4% |
| Neyruz (FR) | 63.5% | 48.0% |
| Porrentruy | 62.5% | 41.2% |
| Zürich | 62.3% | 47.8% |
| Marsens | 61.9% | 43.5% |
| Delémont | 61.8% | 41.8% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Unteriberg | 16.5% | 46.2% |
| Rothenthurm | 23.5% | 46.1% |
| Arch | 24.2% | 41.6% |
| St. Stephan | 24.7% | 45.9% |
| Muotathal | 25.8% | 46.3% |
| Röthenbach im Emmental | 26.8% | 31.1% |
| Dintikon | 27.2% | 50.4% |
| Urnäsch | 27.5% | 45.2% |
| Waldkirch | 27.9% | 49.5% |
| Tuggen | 27.9% | 44.8% |
← Earlier vote: 21 May 2017All votesLater vote: 4 March 2018 →
Source: Federal Statistical Office (FSO), results of federal votes (open data). Communes within today’s boundaries. Official titles of the proposals. dam-api.bfs.admin.ch