Federal vote of 26 November 2006
On 26 November 2006 Switzerland voted on 2 proposals: Federal law on cooperation with the states of Eastern Europe: accepted with 53.4% yes; Federal law on family allowances: accepted with 68.0% yes.
Federal law on cooperation with the states of Eastern Europe
accepted 53.4% · Turnout 45.0%
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Vaud | 61.4% | 49.7% |
| Basel-Stadt | 60.5% | 49.2% |
| Geneva | 60.1% | 49.9% |
| Jura | 60.1% | 40.8% |
| Neuchâtel | 58.8% | 49.2% |
| Zurich | 57.0% | 46.4% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 56.3% | 41.1% |
| Fribourg | 55.8% | 46.5% |
| Zug | 55.4% | 45.6% |
| Bern | 55.3% | 41.6% |
| Grisons | 52.9% | 35.0% |
| Lucerne | 52.4% | 45.8% |
| Valais | 51.5% | 46.5% |
| Solothurn | 51.4% | 50.0% |
| Aargau | 50.1% | 40.6% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 48.5% | 46.8% |
| St. Gallen | 46.6% | 41.7% |
| Schaffhausen | 45.8% | 62.3% |
| Nidwalden | 43.8% | 43.9% |
| Uri | 43.5% | 37.5% |
| Obwalden | 43.3% | 45.7% |
| Thurgau | 43.3% | 42.5% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 41.0% | 39.4% |
| Schwyz | 38.7% | 49.9% |
| Ticino | 37.1% | 44.3% |
| Glarus | 35.4% | 41.0% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Ennetbaden | 76.2% | 47.5% |
| Evilard | 73.3% | 36.8% |
| Villars-sur-Glâne | 71.9% | 47.9% |
| Les Breuleux | 71.4% | 44.3% |
| Bern | 71.2% | 46.4% |
| Pully | 70.6% | 54.0% |
| Delémont | 70.3% | 41.3% |
| Etoy | 69.6% | 54.5% |
| Bolligen | 69.5% | 52.5% |
| Confignon | 69.5% | 57.9% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Unteriberg | 14.8% | 47.1% |
| Rothenthurm | 19.3% | 51.5% |
| Muotathal | 20.4% | 50.7% |
| Sattel | 24.1% | 51.6% |
| Monteceneri | 25.3% | 44.7% |
| Sant'Antonino | 25.7% | 39.1% |
| St. Stephan | 25.9% | 37.8% |
| Affeltrangen | 26.4% | 43.6% |
| Airolo | 27.1% | 49.7% |
| Diemtigen | 27.2% | 31.2% |
Federal law on family allowances
accepted 68.0% · Turnout 45.0%
below 40%40 to 50%50 to 60%60 to 70%70% and more
Result by canton
| Canton | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Jura | 83.7% | 40.9% |
| Fribourg | 75.8% | 46.6% |
| Ticino | 75.8% | 44.3% |
| Vaud | 75.6% | 49.7% |
| Neuchâtel | 75.3% | 49.2% |
| Bern | 73.1% | 41.6% |
| Basel-Stadt | 70.6% | 49.2% |
| Lucerne | 70.1% | 45.9% |
| Solothurn | 69.6% | 50.1% |
| Uri | 69.3% | 37.5% |
| Grisons | 69.1% | 35.1% |
| Basel-Landschaft | 68.4% | 41.2% |
| Geneva | 68.3% | 49.9% |
| Valais | 64.7% | 46.5% |
| Aargau | 63.9% | 40.8% |
| Zurich | 63.9% | 46.4% |
| St. Gallen | 61.9% | 41.8% |
| Obwalden | 60.5% | 45.7% |
| Schaffhausen | 60.5% | 62.2% |
| Zug | 59.0% | 45.5% |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 58.8% | 46.9% |
| Thurgau | 58.4% | 42.5% |
| Schwyz | 57.3% | 49.9% |
| Glarus | 50.3% | 41.0% |
| Nidwalden | 50.3% | 43.9% |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 45.5% | 38.4% |
Communes with the highest and lowest yes share
Communes with at least 1,000 registered voters.
Highest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Ecublens (VD) | 89.1% | 49.6% |
| Delémont | 89.1% | 41.4% |
| Le Noirmont | 87.8% | 42.3% |
| Belfaux | 87.4% | 47.6% |
| Val Terbi | 87.1% | 38.0% |
| Fontenais | 85.5% | 45.1% |
| Giornico | 85.1% | 45.3% |
| Boncourt | 85.0% | 42.8% |
| Rubigen | 84.8% | 40.6% |
| Courtételle | 84.7% | 37.0% |
Lowest yes share
| Commune | Yes | Turnout |
|---|---|---|
| Gonten | 36.5% | 38.3% |
| Sattel | 38.7% | 51.5% |
| Schwende-Rüte | 42.2% | 36.3% |
| Unteriberg | 42.2% | 47.2% |
| Beckenried | 44.1% | 45.4% |
| Dallenwil | 44.6% | 44.8% |
| Wolfenschiessen | 45.2% | 43.2% |
| Hergiswil (NW) | 46.0% | 42.6% |
| Bussnang | 46.8% | 44.9% |
| Appenzell | 47.1% | 38.4% |
← Earlier vote: 24 September 2006All votesLater vote: 11 March 2007 →
Source: Federal Statistical Office (FSO), results of federal votes (open data). Communes within today’s boundaries. Official titles of the proposals. dam-api.bfs.admin.ch